Thursday, March 3, 2011

Tiger Shark Largest Ever

Old misunderstandings of meddling

(Continued dialogue between torrential and a crescent moon, Part IV, hermeneutics 15)

Sent by the torrential, March 3, 2011 at 7:49

Hello, my crescent moon,

"unfathomable complexity of human relationships" ...

Indeed ...

Is it necessary to return by way of introduction, the love that may or may not feel toward an Arab American, outside pursuits that would allow it to obtain a visa or green card? Yes anyway. For if you do take any love a political dimension, you condemn the history of the Capulets and Montagues, Romeo and Juliet, to reproduce indefinitely. You will find that in this case, as it is a Shakespearean tragedy, it will never only bring evidence that Shakespeare was able to stage the archetypes of humanity immemorial. But I forgot: you convince Shakespeare irrémiscible the sin of being the most English of English. Your sentence will be until she does not recognize the archetypal power of his tragedies? I hate to think that thou be there, whatever your grudge against the Anglo-Saxon. Redevisons but seriously, the situation does not lend itself to throw stones lightly. At the end of the Second World War, you remember, in movement that terrible treatment that followed the liberation of these women had their heads shaved for granted, sometimes for reasons of love, sometimes for reasons more venal venial few liberties of sex and heart of German soldiers ? In retrospect, I do not know an honest man that these facts have indignantly, as an act of revenge within the pure sadism, if we can understand, the contrary, we judge an employee guilty of trafficking, broken the black market, let alone a writer, guilty of these movements galvanized people. But no doubt you're now annoyed that my reading grid, to judge these facts of love "a blend of erotic" araboaméricaine, returns to the assessment criteria which are derived from the ever-continuing remanducation the Holocaust, as we feast on with morbidity, meditations on the Passion of Christ, where we're hard to do as if we were always in place of the executioners, never imagining for a moment that we could bring a helping hand to Christ in His Passion. What do we look a less selective and do we know we move the Nakbah much as the Holocaust and the Passion of Christ, which are in continuity, like all historical catastrophes, which resulted in casualties tortured, as is going through Libya to date. I have oeillaires of course, and yet love is not primarily an act of patriotism. I know it is hard for you to agree with me, you who happens to call your wife "France". I'm not saying that the patriotic dimension does not play in love, if it plays a role, is to complicate it. Politics complicates the love, but not displease thee, it is not certain that the "erotic miscegenation" is able to dispel the mystery of love, for example this "mystery Arabic" I 've talked to the Western way you thought without Fear and acquired your case, this "mystery Arabic" which thickens in the light of this recent poll where, when you ask the opinion of the French revolution on Arab, 69% of them admit that their scary. They would not say that about revolutions in Eastern Europe, about which I have already drawn parallels with the Arab revolutions during one of my recent contributions. This fear is of course partly to the degeneration of an individual who can enjoy more freedom when it is collected by one of his fellow human beings. But it also stems from the fact that our relationship has never found the balance. They are probably unbalanced by what you complained of the West have done against thee, they are also what young people are uprooted from your nation against the Aboriginal treating lower than a dog, example by calling him "souchien" or "asshole of his race," the native who does not bristled, which simply look down and be afraid. It is that, so we gained Euroarab Union that killed MHWPs of your wishes, we should reset the counters to zero result in the past, "leaving open the door of forgiveness," the word that you know , keeping the mind alert simply share and secondly, that the past does not recur.

Let's stay a little differential in our perceptions of history. What have you against the U.S. so that your Islamic Republic inherited from the Imam Kohmeini has been continuously calling the U.S. "the Great Satan"? Or, to decline my question in two others that you make it more acceptable and less shocking, what have you against America, I could be myself? Or, what have you against the average American? The average American is a good guy or a good girl, who are very unfamiliar with that frame the administration of their condition, because it keeps them in a climate "comfort inculturel" which takes the place of their intellectual comfort. It's that smile that is no longer a Yankee cowboy that, he also bombarded me perhaps more than did the Germans at the landing Normandiie me, he has not only bombed, but he wanted to wipe out as France, I can not blame him, because he did for my good, bringing me cigarettes and chocolate in releasing me for the second time, you know the trick? You tell me maybe if I do not blame him, until I happen to forget that destroyed Dresden, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, it is also because won the war, he and his flippant materialism, he and his Marshall Plan that rebuilt me, him and his soft ideology "that pretends not to have him and his movies that I stuff myself every day when I go to the cinemas, because my leaders have failed to negotiate in my name, not even the film preferably European or saving "the French cultural exception", "but the fact that, through agreements guaranteed highest level, the invasion of American film is set in stone and is not a coincidence. The film is one of the largest sites of propaganda. Am I the victim of propaganda by the hypnosis ? Possible. But anyway: jam for brainwashing, what state would be my conscience if they were not allies, but the other fool who had won the war? I would conduct less extensive morally agree-in. And you as well, because, contrary to what the European public has finally internalized as Hitler did not want to unduly liquidate the Jews by killing them. He has devised the "final solution", where he has used the expression, what the historian Edouard Husson doubts, because he was cornered by the advancing allies. Initially, Hitler would not been unfavorable to Zionism: "Everyone at home". I have the distinct dishonor (but not in friendship as in love, there really dishonor) of having a true friend, one of those that give you to eat when you do nothing, that was Hitler's ideas. On the Jews, he told me that what the Nazi party thought the early 1990s was that this problem was the responsibility of Arafat. But originally, Hitler was not against Zionism, if it could rid Europe of Jews, so he thought. You whose Zionism has become the main enemy, the mystery on which he will then yet I tell you what I understand, if it was the other who had won the war, he favored Zionism, or he would have left the problem for Palestinians, but in all cases, ç would have been a slaughter worse than that which arose from the victory of the war by the Allies. Argue that you could compare this fiction of carnage that we live in? I can not follow you on this point, but the question is worth asking.

"unfathomable complexity of human relationships," he goes even to the identity of nations! I said the U.S. we had paid twice. In fact, the Treaty of Versailles, they did that we dismantle you and I, Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman Empire, all in the name given to the right of small nations, seeds of divisions, exist as political entities, not by a desire disintegration, but because President Wilson, on which Freud had not dried up anger, were generous ideas, he did not see that they could suffer the same kind historic turning you accuse my injunction love to have known. The 14 proposals of President Wilson did not go without at the same time, he was allowed Germany to rise from his defeat, and he was ordered by the Treaty of Versailles that Germany would be demilitarized and monitored. Lorsqu'Hitler has remilitarized the Rhineland, violating the Treaty of Versailles, Europe and the world has been done in a spirit prémünichois. Surveillance of new entities that Wilson, who inspired the Versailles Treaty, establishing in the region where beats the heart of what the tuappelles précarré of your nation led, come he traced the boundaries were very indecisive, by the establishment of the British mandate, which is known today for its management empire calamitous racket in the region, which began to be a well of "black gold" that the West felt he had great need to be conveyed, because it was more equipped with technical support in "black gold" was the fuel that the country possessed of deposits "black gold", who discerned the more interest that could provide them with what we now call the "oil profits" annuity that the British mandate them mostly plundered, without acclimate themselves to massive use of oil, how the British Mandate would probably showed good prince, good prince, but that would have worked against its interests.

United States wilson LED sink their natural allies, Great Britain and France, in the trap of "trench warfare" that could not stop shaking the world, or were called by referees intervened, contrary to the vocation set itself the "May Flower" which was the isolationism of the land of the "new world", who would not s'immicer in the affairs of other states. As this immiction was not natural, but that each time the United States found themselves in a strong position to impose their rules of conflict because their intervention had been decisive, the result was that the regulation states United proposed, between good intentions and willingness to take advantage of the windfall was constantly unbalanced. The United States of Europe by the subject "Marshal Plan" without which she could never recover. They made you receive any "Marshal Plan", but would gladly accommodated a peaceful settlement with you sales conditions to their advantage, the oil windfall, if what you call "Zionist element" was between the time came to play spoilsport, encountering progressively support the Americans, which was not acquired in what has preceded the birth of Israel and who is not acquired at that time, could well return if circumstances became less favorable to Israel, my personal hope that this support is not turned up wanting to "wipe Israel off the map", as Israel complains be the only state in the world to know the evocation of this spell, but to rebalance the relationship between Israel and its partners. How? It's a big question, why, if I wanted to make a decisive opinion and some interest, I should have all the cards in hand, and I'm not alone in having to admit my powerlessness, impotence, but this n is not inevitable, it should work to rebalance and be able to impose, by changing the balance of power enough to make it become necessary for himself, as a feature of American power or what remains of it, will you tell me no doubt with Emmanuel Todd, is to conduct a pragmatic policy, pragmatism may be involved in your dislike of that power, because without a policy design is certainly a political nonsense.

thee infiltrated America's mercenaries, she took you bombed more recently than me, you've won anything there, I understand that you're less inclined to forgive him that little feeling in his paper, I feel worn to do so. Did she bombed and sent its missionaries and mercenaries, the first less intelligent, I tell you, that the missionaries of religion established by seniority, which had collected the culture of the people being evangelized and n ' conversions not buy with money, and I want to be sure, the charge is pisque you often utters' lencontre evangelists, for which you say appear even less respect than it proselytizing again and do not bet on intelligence, who uses his financial power and gives the surrenchère spectacular. I'll make you see are not always much more forgiving for the religions of ancient extraction, so do not you do a lot of gifts to the Coptic Patriarchate which has behaved badly in your eyes, I do not disagree in principle, I has no elements that could refute or confirm your information.

However, some evangelists to attend, it is true, rooted not in Pentecostalism they loathe, but in the former Lutheran religion they want to retain the loyalty of his first successor, current belongs among others poet whom I sent the plate I made for him, I want the latter, extremely nosy and cultivated man, who was lucky enough to attend in his life a few bright minds of this time, he found himself among some evangelicals leading anthropologists, who have never thought that the solution evangelism could pass through brutal solutions, especially as one of the anthropologists, including the poet was a friend, said he had found many traces of what he called the "Logos Spermaticon" that is to say, a revelation concordant with that of the Bible but do not insert it, do not belong and diverging points not money, as if they had the Bible, central shaft of General Revelation and private revelations or special, in which God continues to speak beautifully in all time of human history.

Second is what I want to bring to your knowledge, hoping thereby to bring you a little balm to the heart: I had two days ago a conversation with the pastor of this tiny temple of Lutheran evangelists, where m 'arrives at its request, to accompany worship. I asked him, half and half out of curiosity because I need the light of one of my co-religionists, he was a different religion from mine, what he thought happened today, I told him that I was up to his neck, although not sure I understand, so I was a problem of conscience, and not being sure, for the bargain , that the interest I showed them to me does not turn away from what I had to give my revelation-Source. He replied that at present he was unable to predict the outcome of these revolutions, which can not be rooted only with a historical long-term tolerance that would take time to emerge in companies which could not but rejoice that they were trying to recover their dignity, it seemed impossible, at this moment in history, hoping to convert a Muslim, who could be at this moment, only available to a understandable resentment. Hard work of the mission and quasi inconvertibility the majority of Muslims, constituting, for this pastor, an admission meritorious and ripping, because the Mission is the raison d'etre of the evangelist, who does not compromise the fact that one can not save himself only by the name of Christ, as we Catholics who have become more liberal and who believe they can also escape through the light emanating from the truths which in Other religions are a reflection of the Divine Light. Catholicism has abdicated its anathematizing adage: "Outside the Church no salvation"! The evangelist, no, but he gives the impossibility is historically to convey its message in the Hands of Providence, while confessing that, if so, the arguments you make are worth, namely that the cruise, in its historical form, was cause of resentment that may have a hard life. On what I was making the original intent of the Crusades was not illegitimate, that the Christian wished not only come to meditate at the tomb of Christ, but that it is not in the hands of the infidels, depending on how Christianity could only speak in a context of Christianity, he said he did not share my opinion. I replied that looting and massacres which had committed the Crusaders were in the hijacking of the intent of the licentious and transgressive acts, as it happens too that man is unable to match its intentions with their results, I divided that Christ had set an excellent criterion for judging human actions, perfected in all situations, which was that we should judge a tree by its fruit, which led him to conclude in retrospect and in good Reformed that the Crusades were not blessed by God, as the result of the Crusades was obviously rotten, devvenues an obstacle to evangelization, and having sustained a hate infested impregnable christianomusulmanes relations (or islamicochrrétiennes). I finally asked him what role he felt that the church could play in such times: to ensure that conflict does not sembrase be an interposition force which, at the risk of taking shots, trying to hold the arm both Jews and Muslims, to revive the plagues, or antisemitism, or the oppression by Muslims. This pastor of Lutheran persuasion, therefore, the German state he felt no Zionist. ^ We can only be disarmed arm between these two communities, showing by example of our "love of neighbor" it was high time to make a bridge. We did it in that shots to take, it was a long, very long term, as the purification of our "love of neighbor" that we were finally free exercise. We would do so without watering down our faith and being able to report to whom we ask. Well, I hope, an evangelist by your heart. In any case, his speech was deeply refreshed and comforted.

"unfathomable complexity of human relationships", admits that we have erred both! You and I are agreed, should I remind you? The fact that the threat of foreign meddling away, except in the form of air protection "freeze flights to Libya" as "asset freeze", detention of oil resources by insurgents so decisive sign that Colonel Gaddafi would have to capitulate, it was a matter of days, it was hoped not months, because then it would be a bloodbath. Our friend Algerian sent me many articles, was the first to be surprised in a private email he sent me, the lack of mention of the situation obamienne Jamahiriya. In fact, the voice of one who still believes the big-mania all the "Oval Office" did not put less than a week to wait and hear. For once, the other embassies had preceded it. Interventions obamiennes watching the previous revolutions had not been brilliant:
"Egypt must, Tunisia must ..."
By its vote, the top U.S. diplomat did not recognize very grateful to the leaders she nourishes, speaking to them on a tone that would have revealed their true nature of servant, unless there was any doubt, that does not recall that after his election, in an admission of hegemony confusing cynicism childish, William Jeferson Clinton proclaimed:
"America continues to lead the world" as if the world had asked the U.S. to be his guide and as if that would appease the Clinton position, if it exists, the concern of the world no longer be under supervision. Obama, without noticing it, borrows the same rhetorical register. The first reaction was that it appeared to say that "the Libyan regime would accountable "blood he shed for his people. A wise, it meant that he" should "stay in place, but it would be held accountable. In a second phase of what took for further hesitation obamienne but turned activist, during which wise minds, as proved to be Dominique de Villepin in this new occurrence,, wanted to limit the aggressiveness of the "international community" to which an air blockade protect the insurgents phase when yourself wrote that it seemed that Americans had renounced military intervention, Obama had his military arsenals around Libya. Whence came that the movement was not seen Algézira journalists or anybody? Two days ago, we knew that everything was in place, if necessary, intervene, Spectrum fear that together the tyrant and his rebels, who may well meet if that were the case, and maneuvers that we can not say at least the mouth, the European foreign ministries have approved the unfriendly Alain Juppe, who lost his diplomatic varnish had been able to demonstrate during the two years where he served as Minister of Foreign Affairs, n ' defending a position no less villepinochiracquienne (remember that Villepin had been his collaborator at the same time), saying that foreign intervention would be the worst effect, can not go off overnight, without obtaining the approval of the Security Council and, if appropriate, we must have known it put us in a situation where we "make war"! It was fun, anyway, to hear that, for once, things were called by name. We make war that we did so clearly expressed before the onset of Operation Desert Storm "in early 1991! It would have made the hoi polloi belligerens reflect public opinion Europeans peaceful and it would have saved Iraq, as you rightly say, to break up for reasons that are nothing less than intrinsic to broader corporate divisions in the Arab world. For his part, Gaddafi nice play to boost morale by saying that "foreign intervention" and, let's be clear, the U.S., would create a situation in Iraq, even worse than Iraq: here, we recognize the effect of hyperbole about our speaker is customary.

And yet, why these delays by the U.S. administration, which has never shown such haste, to meet its military arsenals close to Iran? Let us leave the United States the benefit of the doubt? The United States do they really protect civilian populations that Gaddafi massacre without compunction? But how to protect them if they were bombed, which only adds to the massacre of the massacre, and how to intervene without bombardment? We are more accustomed to demonstrations of meddling in proportion, so that one comes to wonder if they ever existed! Or, trivially, Obama wants to enter Libya to settle a little bit long term, as in Afghanistan, like Iraq, perhaps there is something about a "quagmire of Afghanistan," or anarchy that Iraq will cause his presence, but not without making sure what to look for all: that oil wealth can not escape it? Obama is really reassuring that the majority of deposits is under the control of insurgents? The oil ... It is far from having closed the valves ... This is the reason we continue to give U.S. meddling in virtually all wars and, true, oil is never far away. When the United States under the Clinton era, wanted to believe they were having a purely moral grounds with Yugoslavia, the experience was not very conclusive;

And even time, the meddling is a moral issue. Can we let a civil war as deadly and murderous rage in a few days without conducting any intervention or meddling? The meddling air, very good: it would prohibit the transport of mercenaries, but it would not prevent the massacre of Gaddafi Libyans (there were already 6500 dead so far). You glimpse a solution through Egypt. This is where your idealism tends to get lost. Because you think the Egyptian army capable, on the home front, to ensure that the revolution does not degenerate into its territory, and to ask the Security Council UN, which prudenciellement, can not consider it as the legitimate guardian of a little fragile regime, is to provide the Libyan, even if there is legitimate Egypt as "mother of nations" role she played in a time so distant civilizations that does not mean she can do it forever, and especially at this moment full of perils of its own history, where the problem could unite Libyan and galvanize like divide and weaken it? Egypt is ready to take that risk? ? This does not seem very realistic, however, she and Tunisia are more submerged by waves of migration, for which Tunisia at least beg "the foreign force" to help him, who wants to do it, not avoiding a humanitarian catastrophe, but in repatriating these migrants as they come. Egypt faces you see at the same time, domestically, with the influx of refugees and its own poverty does not know how welcome the political and social organization of the post-Mubarak and finally international settlement of a military conflict that took place outside the home? You tell me that it did not deter the troops from the French Revolution, but they were one year convention behind them, it was France who was attacked and not a third country, and it even says that the victory of Valmy was rigged. In short, situations come and go and do the same. Everything I see, so we do not let the current plunge in chaos, is that the "foreign power" as you call it, to avoid a humanitarian catastrophe, does what she can do: send the "red cross" and humanitarian organizations, handpicked by Egypt and Tunisia for their honesty proven and recognized that these organizations enter Libya, which they organize the reception of refugees in Tunisia and Egypt, they feed them and organize their life there, until it settles. I understand that you fear for the forfeiture of the exclusively Arab movement that is the Arab world. But wisdom has never forbidden to call for help when one is submerged. Wisdom and perhaps wisdom immanent, which is not completely a perception on the Arab revolution it owes its salvation only if the rule saudi overwhelmed by his problems otarcie perfect. It goes without saying that we should monitor the intrigues of these organizations do not exceed the mandate entrusted to them would be, and that organizations such as Islamic Relief should count the number of participating NGOs. The fact that she ruled over a community of NGOs in a situation that concerns an area of Islamic influence would ensure that at least has taken the measure of recollecting is happening during these revolutions Arab , disturbed by the fact that a tyrant resists unexpected, but the wind of these revolutions could not sweep the country as the tyrants of the Care Bears or "three little pigs," even though Julie Clarini-Nafnaf has in turn after Internet rumors peddled to our case, our correspondent in Algeria, the impact would have been relayed in the Egyptian revolution and Tunisia, the book by Jim Sharp, President of the Albert Einstein Institute.

§ What you write back to his village in this guide Rached El-Ganouchi who, long exiled, returned to the country after having received a rather cold Tunisians, reminds me, I do not know why The legendary character staged by Kahlil Gilbran in "The Prophet". El-Mustapha is returning home after having long resided in a city where he was the light and silent, before leaving, wants to hear his last oracles for the city to live in peace and according to his example. Perhaps, since his village, loved by his family, income where al-Mustapha Gilbran not gone yet, will he make remarks that will fly. Should it generates a candidate in the presidential election? The Prime Minister has any new investment does not is a wise proposal, calling collect, before the organization of any presidential election, a constituent assembly to the Icelandic, and even the French, when the revolution could still avoid falling into terror? The concern here is seen that despite the liberal character of this statesman recalled the service of his country, both because of his age because he was one of Bourguibism dignitaries, all opponents can hardly see the painting more than his predecessor, and démissionnnent one after the other the Government of National Unity, as well as our constituents have not been the French effort to stay up at end provisions that favor in what you call "the government through harmony" advocated by Islam. May the Revolutionary Guards play here and there all their roles! May they keep the flame of freedom and monitor intentions from abroad, it is clear that it is decided to once again play a detrimental role. A plea in opposition to Barak Obama would mean that the world no longer allows him to tell every nation that it "must" do, to come to terms with that which was never established their master. May all nations to send this message! Torrential

taken in tribulation Arab

How Do I Delete Naza Klasza

From specter of foreign intervention and guide Tunisian

(extract dialogue between torrential and a crescent moon, Part IV, column 17)

Sent by the crescent moon, March 2, 2011 23:45 Good evening Torrential

.

The serious issue of foreign meddling in Libya, was that day, the object of many tests, many developments. It appears that this case divide already the people and the insurgents. There were requests to do so, they say Heman cities still captive, but he Heman of these cities, discharges and refusal! It went on to say that the National Transitional Council recently self-proclaimed seeker which is a form of meddling air initiatives can be untimely, without deep and genuine consultation, not the people listening. Some argue that the victory over the former regime is within reach of the people and its possibilities. The others agree, while objecting to the human cost may be high. My deepest wish is that way average is found, which would be intervention and support of Egypt long. If I measure on my part, I do not see what would be the major objection. That Egypt has a long fraternal assistance to Libya's vast, it would keep alive the spirit of Arabism, realizing the gradual restoration of Arab sovereignty. Egypt is to us and we are of it, Egypt was alone in bearing and seed, the organizing force we need. God forbid that the people of Libya wide consensus on this term. Egypt, on this basis, should stimulate a specific mandate of the UN, the League and the OAU. So authorized, it would operate on both sides, would propose a solution to the tyrant and his family, and if he persists, Egypt operates flights that should be enough to deter Libyan aviation remains not yet returned. As the former regime does not seem to have more than mercenaries, their warnings would be made by leaflets dropped or otherwise, having to surrender on pain of bombardment. It is likely that they are running. If despite this demonstration, the tyrant persists in its fortifications, it would make the seat. The fly much talked about, would, according to commentators, the ropes of Egypt, if it operates with simple rollovers, without further action as defensive. Simply fly and patrol areas insurgent, is sufficient to ensure the attacks. Patrols on the southern border, and that of Algeria, would deter the arrival of new mercenaries. Given these provisions, provided they are clearly exposed, the insurgents would be willing and defections would go quickly, in what remains of strength to the tyrant. Probably he thinks fit to enter the path to salvation. These are the wishes I form, very preferable to the other scenarios specific to keep Libya Arab, in the unity and sovereignty, as it is true fraternal obey the injunctions of Egypt, in itself is not disgraced or binding!


A new Tunisian moves me. The guide Rached El-Ganouchi, after spending over a month in the capital since his return from exile, yesterday won his hometown, Hamma, in the South, where he proposes to reside until the end of his life did reach. It was touching to hear this old man, to praise not end his days in a foreign land. It made him welcome in his city, unlike a certain coldness, that officials in Tunis have believed him score. In fact, the more time passes, change minds in this regard. The minority Liberal laïcard and Tunisians, obscure soul Tunisia my deep green, which gradually réaprend to think for itself. It was the rest yesterday, that the political Nahda, meaning rebirth, was legalized. At the very beginning, the guide had promised a presidential candidate, personally, I'm booked on the timeliness of this initiative. It would be better to have no candidate, and play the arbitration. Parliamentarians, however, we would have better outcomes, rather than otherwise, the predictable failure for president would have a negative and demotivating. Appeased, I am glad, that worthy old man, end his days among a people who loves and spend what little strength he has left to study and work. God gives him a good old age and enjoy the rest.


crescent moon.

Gas Wall Heater Parts Diagrams

From inalienable right to challenge

(Continued dialogue between torrential and a crescent moon, Part IV, hermeneutics 14)

Posted by crescent moon, March 2, 2011 at 0:57

My Torrential!


It is beneficial that you do not suffer without distributed, no unjust flogging. My rule is justice, I go effortlessly. My answer is, only the debates around the unmanageable. Other issues, I promise to resume after this weekend, but there is true! Because you're a good man, I think it would not balance our trade can give the impression that one more than the other flagellum. This is often the case in this kind of exchange, the Europeans suffered more criticism than it actually is a pitfall. Frequently there this asymmetry between European and Arab, I must admit. It would be very long, analyze the causes and the springs of this asymmetry, it goes away, even without hostility. One has the impression that often, one will be the receptacle, the other rather issuer. Anyway, know well, Torrential, you have, for me, the same power to issue and blame! Unfathomable depth and complexity of human relationships.


On the history of the American woman, I just want to apologize. All tastes are in nature, but finally, how he saw an Arab daily with such a wife, I can not represent me. Unjust wars are there, present. Recently in Iraq, there were killings and events! Iraqis came out against the occupation and the corrupt administration, necessarily, because living under foreign protection. The so-called minister, defended their absence, the name of democracy! A massacre ensued, in the name of democracy, this is America, which trains its servants in his image. As indeed I am very sensitive to the flesh and blood Arabic, as America takes us for a vile dust, I can not see myself in the arms of an American, sorry! I think the thing is simply unhealthy, I mean in terms of joint Arab. Measures well on you, America has killed millions, killed every day, directly or indirectly. America is constantly developing new forms of torture and terror, she deals directly or through his servants. Will you say that the Iraqi situation is inherent contradictions Arabs? This would afford words. Iraq violated is the country of corruption optimum known prisons and secret prisons, whether above ground or underground. The foreign force is the cause of this fact, gold, other Arab entities, our country, are little more free, power of Iraq. I think Arabic should not share married life with the son or daughter of a country that has every chance to shed our blood. Now everyone does as he pleases. We have the right to notice, that this is unhealthy. I'm pretty sure that no one knows an American, that to win a visa or any facility, should not tell it about love, either!

Let the new Libyan
. J'aprouve the UN, declared air exclusion, banning all flights in the sky Libyan. J'aprouve this prohibition in law which makes illegal arrivals of such and such, neighboring countries, possibly mercenaries. It does not make illegal use of air power, it already is, in situations of repression, as the rebels or insurgents have no air force. At present, even when stood the Security Council on this subject, I do not know what it is, in practice, and if the former regime still has air forces loyal and obedient, and what have, relatively, the insurgents. It is very possible that the situation is equivalent, or nearly so. But assuming it does not, and the plan being barred, be able to use this powerful weapon, even in this case, I just want to the exclusion of law, not realizing of this order, by any foreign hand. The scheme is being extinguished if it is a matter of time. Possible that this is expensive, unless the talks have the support of Colonel, that any residence or atribuée him with his family and relatives in Egypt, the man is not, it seems to me, those who wish to end their life in exile from South America. I think this vraissemblable sollution, since he himself knows well that any sort, he lost the game.


Suppose otherwise, it is still an air superiority and it makes lethal use. What would the practical exclusion? According to a U.S. official, it would destroy the Libyan defenses, locate the bomb and the high altitude, if it is feasible by missiles fired from afar. Of any kind would require powerful explosives, anti-aircraft defenses, often fortified and located underground. These bombs would cause immense damage in populated areas, where the defenses are certainly, as elsewhere. It should, before patrolling the sky Libyan. It seems clear, too, would be to ensure defenses, available to the insurgents themselves, because of the risk of reversals. There would almost certainly before such a spectacle. If I measure on my part, I hate, certainly not see the massive bombing of Libya, nor kill our aircraft by none abroad! Division Libyans, and all Arab, this is what would follow! It would be the end of our revolutions, given the alternative! The reaction cons-revolutionary would have a field day show, parts and evidence in hand, what would lead the movement.


The gear, in military matters, is a sequence that must be judged as likely! Nothing says, in effect, that if we start well, merging events, it goes any further: invasions may well begin this way. The Arab free does not have this bread! I do not want to have to thank anything, America summit of tyranny. That is what our qu'entrevois Bchara Hazmi, very perceptive in these matters. American hypocrisy is obvious, since they themselves have resorted to mercenaries, which reduced the resistance in Falluja, Iraq, martyred city, including through use air. Measurements on you, and perceive the world, also, for my skin and my senses. The Western man is eligible for the goodness he has in him justice, but its leaders and the elites format it quite differently, according to his ways and that its slopes. In fact, the cruise is against nature. Suprematism your government is so embodied in them, he is barely conscious! You want me to believe them this time! I do not see why.


God willing, a solution will occur without bloodshed. Otherwise, it is the Libyans to follow through the work release. If the forced end, it is their responsibility to call for help from Egypt, a brother country, which must act in both directions, providing a haven or the stick. We think it is military in its strings, should the UN designates as a single instrument. Some say that Egypt is paralyzed as a result of the political situation not yet certain, perhaps also because of the opportunities that s'ofriraient an enemy, always on the lookout. Finally, the action of Egypt, would be seen as legitimate, as an act of justice, with the assurance that Egypt can resolve the conflict, without being able to impose anything the Libyans. Moreover, be witness that, whatever happens, the insurgents have not called the West to their aid, far from it!


If the West wants us to help, that therefore, he expressed his support on the streets of capitals. Nobody knows why, your Marxist or Altair, do not burn the pavement in our favor. Would we be wrong in Arab-Muslims? The cruise works there without their knowledge, these crypto-Christians? Finally, this day, admittedly, "Humanity" publishes an article that relays the insurgents vow to liberate themselves. "Humanity" welcomes unwittingly across the holy struggle. Some asked to Westerners and others to use their capabilities for interference on the communications plan. There is already a freeze on assets, and remembered that oil resources are under control of insurgents. It would also be likely, unless there are significant reserves, the capital cities and some remained faithful, are poorly supplied and resupplied.


Enough of blood and displeasure, God wants to inspire the guide Qaddafi that Libya is bigger than him, that his people is superior, that the nation is above himself, the generosity and wisdom penetrate his heart. What the Americans are for their expenses, they leave empty-handed, that the momentum of our peoples will continue until the final triumph of just causes. God save my nation.


crescent moon.
----- Original Message ----- From
Julien Weinzaepflen
To: Abdellatif Harzi
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 4:08 AM
Subject: Re: salutary development


Dear crescent moon,

The message which I answer, albeit belatedly, contains about whom I can not stay without reacting.

1. There are indeed taken in when you wrote, wishes to ingest Western, but I remember that, when the plan was not to intervene militarily in Libya, but simply to establish an air bridge over this country to prevent the Air Force still obedient to Gaddafi to bomb people civilians. That the petroleum interest is not completely absent from a Western desire to help people massacred, I think a point here out of season, because the West could very well solve this problem with the plan that would have succeeded one of Qaddafi, which he never really spared, not even during the last period, there is only keep in the ear of memory prompted howls of outrage by the West when Libya has directed the commission of human rights, not only because of Libya took the opportunity to multiply reports condemning Israel, although you hast suggested, not without logic, that since the liberalization that Colonel Gaddafi had granted its oil resources, he would have allied with the Israeli power. Not displease thee, all Western meddling, to follow, not alike, and all obey not unilaterally dishonorable reasons. The only question that seems devoid of imputing motives facing Western research on how to save the Libyan people's violence was the one who became his tyrant, questions that have occupied the Security Council until yesterday morning, February 28, seems to me to agree that West could have had the same reaction against the last humanitarian operation "hard lead" that has stunned Gaza in 2008 and, likewise, against "the war of Lebanon that destroyed much of the infrastructure of this country Freedom already alienated and monitored on all sides, on the pretext that Israel would not face the danger that made him run the Hesbollah, war in which we have not forgotten that Sarkozy, questioning an official of the Israeli General Staff, could only ask him bluntly:
"How long does it take to finish the job? "

2. You write that our "leaders are the plague and leprosy in the world, makes them tyranny, they are the same tyranny." Recapture your current proves we can be free of tyranny, tyranny if there a. Because it remains to prove that this tyranny shall essentially of "foreign forces", and not internal causes to countries where it operates. After all, we need to know if it is the West that overthrew King Idris (the West has badly supported the Libyan regime, even though some standardization has been established after the voluntary control officer that he has left on its mineral resources), even if it was the West that forced the post-colonial societies, once they gained independence, not to hold companies that should become well. He has tried to bring their expertise in administrative organization (because we do not hunt with impunity administration substitute for well trained by another improvised), but the West was ousted from power by these gain their independence, Can we understand in the first movement, but since the same has never ceased to reproach him for having given these people to themselves, whereas de Gaulle conceived what became known as Edgar Pisani later to New Caledonia "independence association." Governments that drove the former colonial power to it accuses of not having assisted at the same time that they suspected her of wanting to practice constantly ingesting she opened her mouth, while asking him do not cut "pump Finance" and continue to feed its corrupt regimes in the name of duty to remember who asked Western colonial reparation for sin. It would still have the Arab world stops looking for ways not to attack first to himself and to attribute his illness to the one he did. The West would have opposed all the resistance he wanted, he would never have prevented the Arab world to unite, if he really wanted to, which is not yet acquired the same "day today ". You just have to see how to face a fair start, the West can only be content to endorse the event, it was heartening to more or less sincere, but unable to do anything to upset the logic of start. Resignation is not genetic, although there may be fatalism part atavistic. By atavism, hear well what I put: either the story or how self-perception against the precepts that have been received to send our behavior responses within the collective unconscious and beyond the logic, which should be contingent right from the atavistic instinct as to intelligence, but we are full of instinctive springs, which are the basis of a significant part of our reactions.

3. What ultimately justifies that the West has only recently been fully sincere joy in your freedom gradually recovered? Imagine that he also has memory, and he remembers the Arab expansionism came the surprise well before the Crusades, the failure of which may have fostered an instinct cruise. To say a word, the West would want to ensure that your victories are the defeat of particular person and not his. Because the West has not only memory, but he hears the curses which the Flagella you daily. Be assured of one thing: the West has the same love of humanity than you. The West was the first to believe in "the ideology of progress" in which he would have liked and you lead with humanity. It is not up to a certain conception of colonization Republican who has in part to obey the will to train the colonized peoples, considered as less developed or, frankly, as well as talking or Jules Ferry renan , which were nothing less than clerical, "inferior" in a step which he knew technically depositary. You may dispute this Republican colonization and all that are more secular the illusion of believing in the same time that technical superiority went hand in hand with an ideological superiority. But this error that the event is never shared by all peoples of instinctive belief in a god who gives victory and abundance to those who take the right path to acquire it. This sense of being justified by the abundance meets celuui of the oppressed whose voice cries out "justice" because he never sees that it be redistributed for the common good, although it works perhaps more than others to benefit humanity. The perversion of the system has increased for macroeconomic reasons, some would say inherent to capitalism, which have alienated the production of its human sources, reduced by being in the Marxist analysis as "means of production."

4. Western distrust may increase a penchant racialist redundant in your rhetoric. So, you ever make an apology for "erotic miscegenation," you wonder what an Arab can find good to marry a U.S. interrogation in which pierces an irony that I know you n 'are not fooled, because you know like me that love is blind, but U.S. has as much charm as any woman in the world: it is simply a different charm. But this racialism, not only differentialist but inegalitarianism may lead you to say, when you consider yourself and let yourself Take that you are "world harmony and, dare I say, beauty." How do you want the West do not distrust, when he hears such professions of superiority, which transport it in the memory, I will not insult you to tell the German nation, which also took for a "master race", but the "election" of the Jewish people, including your words carry a mirror in your understanding of yourself, a true reflection attenuated in that you do not give a representative character of the humanity, and want to lead humanity in your victory, but only after having rectified the wrongs that you feel it has had against you?

5. And this way you yelled at the beseeching thee to love thee, as a "porcupine who wants to be kissed," is defined as well one of my friends Kabyle after a diagnosis which has been addressed by a psychologist, because you naively believe that the EU finds the "will to live" when you are released? First there is this that your liberation is not yet completely fulfilled, so he observes and asks only to be welcomed in advance, if it goes to the end of his aspirations. Then there is the EU has always welcomed the releases. Remember that the EU also carries a revolutionary instinct since the French Revolution, which was exported throughout Europe and that Trotskyism has exalted desire to "permanent revolution" erected under government. Instinct usefully tempered by the conservatism that I hear you answer me that it should alleviate any revolutionary conducted it does not degenerate into anarchy and chaotic dissociating, what I can only give you reason. I wrote this afternoon that Christianity was in his genes, from St. Paul, a form of resignation which was to limit cooperation with regimes unjust. I should add that St. Thomas Aquinas has largely corrected this when he accompanied the almost slavish obedience to state authorities of the legitimacy of tyranicide, when the tyrant, he was a "very Christian king" , were to give only immoral orders. St. Thomas Aquinas was the first inventor of civil disobedience. What is the significance of this revolutionary feeling in Islam? I'll ask this without malice, because I'm not a hater of the revolutionary spirit, but I know exactly the limits.

So, the EU welcomes the Arab victory because it flatters revolutionary instinct. But I assure you that while it is well prepared, while he rejoiced, the European can not help but be wary, and it is perfectly possible that those who 's are welcome before you, beyond the fact that they were happy for you, also may have tried to spare the future and you reconcile, in case of victory that would win your nation in its uprising would end just by the strength to triumph over liberty, as he arrived in the eastern countries, the revolution was the triumph of money on the aspirations for the issuance of the leaden weight, which took him to gulag anyone trying to lift it. This was the disillusion trained for Western man who only wanted to believe it, and drifts pseudoreligieuses quite oligarchy of the revolution, colorful or not, countries from the east. Now, after all, the money is miserable, but he does Collateral violence: it does not buy happiness and unhappiness does that when you do not, so it does nothing at all to the limit it is incapable of doing evil. If you consider that really caused all your troubles can be attributed to the Western man and his intrigues cruises, leprosy of humanity, your verbal abuse Collateral is not that the Western man who never desired your humiliation bet the inside of himself. If he does not so masochistic to your arguments are as many lashes are you doing to rain on his back, because he might be bent, he does not want to be more so. I know that the individual has separated the broad back in force no longer meet the exasperation many of which he suffered on all sides. But he backs off not to say that he wanted to have a backache. Your

Torrential son of a generation that has full back, so this gives him a sciatic makes you want to remain static
----- Original Message ----- From
: Abdellatif Harzi
To: Julien Weinzaepflen

Re: Danger in Libya

Thanks Torrential this shipment. I might make many objections, but not enough time. There are inter-actions, I do not disagree, as America acts on us, we act on it. I remain skeptical about the mechanical efficiency and massive use of new technologies. There are Arabs distorted and degenerate, of Atlanta, I have no doubt! He must learn to remember that the Arab-Muslim public, is precisely the world, who fear the more plots drifts and West! We can say that our people are the world's most informed, in substance and subtlety, those who analyze the more for fear of conspiracy and of the trap. They smell a conspiracy by far!


The doubts that contains this article, however, are reasonable, they should incorporate, as food for thought. But now, precisely, the Arab entirely repugnant to the thought of living a "color revolution"! Tunisia has left, out of weakness, no doubt, impose jasmine, so we did not find a name describing the events of Egypt long. There was, indeed, Iran, an attempt to color revolution, without any success. This was indeed the over-publicized, unlike two revolutions Arabs. The third, an armed insurrection would even deliberately ignored! Iranian presidential elections in 2009, the media was such that the French radios, we informed participation rates, as if he was acting in France. There are far, this artful media exposure, the relative silence, or to disseminate false information that the French media, revolutions against Arabs. Worse still, commentators and intellectuals striving to adulterate, falsify and misrepresent the true meaning of our popular revolts and our movements. What contortions and effort, as Julie Deploys Clarine, anxious to take from us, our depth of Islam and Arabism, to bring us back to its size miserable self, claiming the lack of meaning and depth. The blood shed in the field of martyrs testify against her as the weeping and wailing of those who lost their son and loved ones! What would she say the Libyan situation, where the insurgency is in part driven by the scholars, that unify the people and tribes composed of cement in the holy war?


Danger hovers over Libya. The insurgency has kept and free land, the tyrant, despite his threats can only make the blood of the people unnecessarily, without return and resume. A military aviation company based in Ben Gazi, has so far joined the insurgents. The tyrant is powerless military, and have great difficulty, to keep authority over his forces. Bchara Hazmi, made even this remark, that the regime is disintegrating at a rate greater than the progress and gains of the revolution. Yesterday, the daughter of the tyrant, attempted to flee, with three others to the island of Malta. They were denied permission to land. Ultimately, success, the victory is given to some, and if there is resistance and barracks in bounquers, it would take time for a hard seat, but the case is nevertheless certain.


But now that Westerners are increasingly willing to intervene, saying the number of victims and the humanitarian duty of meddling. In reality, they want to pick the fruit develop, install a government of their choice, even appropriating the resources of the Arab people of the vast Libya. A Libyan scholar, described tonight as a traitor to his country, who uses the military meddling. It ensures that such calls n'hémanent not the Libyans of the interior, or any revolutionary, but only traitors. Therefore, cut short, and control as quickly as possible, the land and its resources by itself.


At least Bchara Hazmi, and these scholars Libyans, fall agree on the fact that the insurgents must as soon as possible, create a common political entity, even nonexistent, a revolutionary transitional authority, which could take Ben Gazi temporraire its capital. This entity, created soon, should stimulate the recognition of the region, at least that of Egypt, Tunisia, Turkey. From there, the authority, should dispel any inclination to ingest, raising his voice against the thieves of freedom. Already, Turkey protested against these projects untimely opportunistic meddling.


That, indeed, the gap between clearly the wishes of our peoples, and toxicity, the corruption of your rulers cruises. Your rulers, Torrential, are wound and leprosy in the world, they proceeded tyranny, they are the same tyranny! Humanity is sick and tired of the arrogance and complacency of your leaders and your elite! Indeed, without hesitation, our revolutions are, at present, anti-Western, how do not be? And if our revolutions are so little, why the hype that inspires you. Because basically, they will carry as much as we do! I see that France deep breathes better thanks to our people. My patients tell me their deep joy. One was pleased that the channel can be reopened to ship in the Iranian navy. He told me not liking the image Afreux and detestable, the Arab humbled and humiliated and that of governments bent. Why, our humiliation pleases no one? Is it perhaps, that our natural posture, as we want to see us, it is precisely the rise and pride!


When my nation rises, every free man welcomes it. Our victories are the defeat of anyone, they redolent rights and humanity. Our losses are evil and ugliness to all. Torrential you, which analyzes and down in the fundamentals, so why the European sulfur he hated to see us and abused when he found the will to live when he appears we find ourselves greatness? The European low stronger than we prefer. Because for him, we embody something of the harmony and meaning. That's my guess. That's why I think the West, provided it is not too toxic, Therefore, mankind relies heavily upon us, and our glorious revolution. We are the world's harmony, and if I dared say, her beauty! There is no doubt that if America thinks they play with us, it probably will fall under our passion and seduction. Devil, that one of the characters of the article was married to an American! I imagine a moment in his place. How do we love truly an American, seriously? Just think, Torrential, searching for the reasons why Europeans, is still touched our lives.


crescent moon.
----- Original Message ----- From
Julien Weinzaepflen
To: Abdellatif Harzi
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 4:58 PM Subject
: the role of the United States in the Evolt the Arab street, the case of Egypt


Posted by Abdelwahab Houah, lighting should not be overlooked .


Ahmed Bensaada *


There's nothing more exciting than seeing people recover their freedom after being subjected to the yoke of despotism and regain his pride after years of humiliation.

Tides human parading through the streets, occupying seats, deploying scathing and irreverent slogans, wielding a word so long confiscated, sporting a dignified grossly violated the quintessence of divine happiness.

But the aftermath of these riots leave us somewhat perplexed. What have they done except the tops of regimes?

Let's see. Tunisia: a Ghannouchi which remains in place despite the mob and years to serve a mafia, a blogger who chooses to sit as a government minister who has personally abused and thousands of young people who prefer to escape to harragas the West instead of perpetuating the "revolution" in the land of jasmine. Side of the Nile, same scenario: an Tantawi, pure product of the system, which exceeded the retirement age for a long time, and without reference to the sovereign people, decides to maintain its relations with Israel even before worrying about the fate of its own citizens, a government whose slightly modified and key positions remain in the hands of apparatchiks of the system of cosmetic alterations to the constitution and a request to freeze the assets of the Mubarak family [1] after incomprehensible hesitations, long after those of former regime officials [2].

Is this a "revolution"? Is it possible that the elephant would give birth as a little mouse?

The mixed results of these revolts can not be understood by examining their genesis. Most experts "cathode" or officiating in the major media have agreed to the spontaneous nature of these movements. Roughly speaking, the people can be considered a kind of pressure cooker that could explode under the effect of a social and political pressure too great. This explosion produces a chain reaction in neighboring countries, culture or similar stories. So just wait quietly, to prepare the cameras and microphones to cover in times and places, events that stir the Arab streets. It is a simple and elementary analysis it is difficult to accept on behalf of learned people, Chairs, responsible journals, who have spent their lives scrutinizing the slightest of jolts that region of the world . A bit like the famous economists of our time who could not foresee the huge economic crisis that the world has known recently. What would you say if a meteorologist would not have expected a gigantic hurricane?

In fact, what attracts attention since the early Tunisian riots, it's too big U.S. concern about new technologies. The multiple actions of President Obama and his secretary of state to defend the freedom of access to the Internet and their insistence that schemes engage with popular demonstrations do not interrupt navigation on the web was something suspicious.

Clinton even stated on 15 February, "the Internet has become the public space of XXI century" and that "events in Egypt and Iran, fueled by Facebook, Twitter and YouTube reflected the power of technology connection as accelerators of political change, social and economic development "[3]. She even announced the release of 25 million dollars "to support projects or the creation of tools that work in favor of freedom of expression online, "and the opening of Twitter accounts in Chinese, Russian and Hindi after those in Persian and Arabic. On the other hand, the relationship" complex "between the U.S. State Department and Google have been widely discussed in the press. Moreover, the famous search engine rated" weapon of American diplomacy "[4].

But what is the relationship between the U.S. government and these new technologies? Why charge so high they take decisions in the management of companies that are supposed to be private? This situation is reminiscent of similar U.S. intervention during the events that followed the elections in Iran [5]. The U.S. Department of Foreign Affairs had asked Twitter to see a maintenance operation which led to an interruption of service, which would have deprived the Iranian dissidents as a means of communication [6].

These curious acquaintances between the U.S. government and social networks in parts of the world as sensitive and during social events such delicate is very suspect, is the least we can say.

Another element that draws attention: the excessive media coverage of bloggers, their association with a revolution termed "Facebookien" and insistence on their non-membership in any political movement. So they are young and apolitical that use new technologies to destabilize entrenched autocratic regimes in the political landscape for decades. But where do these young people and how they can mobilize as many people without having received adequate training or be connected to a specific organization?

thing is certain: the modus operandi of these rebellions has all the features of revolutions color that shook the eastern countries in the early 2000s. The color revolutions



revolts that shook the political landscape of Eastern Europe or former Soviet republics have been called "color revolutions". Serbia (2000), Georgia (2003), Ukraine (2004) and Kyrgyzstan (2005) are examples.

All these revolutions, which have resulted in resounding success, are based on the mobilization of young pro-Western local activists, students fiery, engaged bloggers and dissatisfaction with the system. Many

Articles [7] and a remarkable documentary French reporter Manon Loizeau [8] have dissected the procedure and showed that these revolts were the United States who pulled the strings. In fact, the involvement of USAID, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), the International Republican Institute, the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs, Freedom House, the Albert Einstein Institution and the Open Society Institute (OSI) has been clearly established [9]. These organizations are all Americans, financed by either the U.S. budget, either by U.S. private capital. For example, the NED is funded by a budget approved by Congress and funds are managed by a Board comprising representatives of the Republican Party, Democratic Party, the Chamber of Commerce of the United States and the AFL-CIO, while the OSI is part of the Soros Foundation, named after its founder George Soros, the billionaire American financial speculator shows.

Several movements have been established to lead the revolt colored. Among them, Otpor (Resistance in Serbian) is the one that caused the fall of the Serbian regime of Slobodan Milosevic. Logo OTPOR a closed fist, was taken by all subsequent movements, which suggests the strong collaboration between them. Conducted by

Drdja Popovic, Otpor advocates the application of the ideology of individual resistance nonviolent theorized by the philosopher and American political scientist Gene Sharp. Nicknamed the "Machiavelli of nonviolence," Gene Sharp is none other than the founder of the Albert Einstein Institution. His book "From Dictatorship to Democracy" (From dictatorship to democracy) has been the basis of all the colored revolutions. Available in 25 different languages (including Arabic of course), this book is available free on the Internet and its last edition dates from 2010. Its first edition, intended for Burmese dissidents in Thailand, was published in 1993.

The case of Egypt

is the movement of April 6 [10] which has been spearheading the protest popular Egyptian and the main architect of the fall of Hosni Mubarak. Consisting of young middle class, activists, enthusiasts of new technologies, this movement has, since 2008, supported the workers' demands. The first collusion between this movement and the U.S. government has been leaked by Wikileaks. There are 2 cables (and 08CAIRO2371 10CAIRO99) dating respectively from November 2008 and January 2010 which clearly show relationships ties between the U.S. Embassy in Cairo and the Egyptian activists [11, 12]. Israa Abdel Fattah blogger [13], co-founder of the movement of 6 April, is mentioned by name in the second document as part of a group of activists who participated in a training program organized by Freedom House in Washington. The program, named "New Generation", was funded by the State Department and USAID, was to form "political and social reformers.

These training of Egyptian activists in the United States likely" represent a third way, moderate and peaceful "Are not uncommon. Condoleeza Rice (May 2008) and Hillary Clinton (May 2009) met under the auspices of Freedom House (FH). These dissidents have even held talks with senior U.S. administration [ 14].

Otpor activists, strong experience in destabilizing authoritarian regimes, have founded a center for training aspiring revolutionaries. This institution, the CANVAS (Center for Applied Non Violent Action and Strategies) is in the Serbian capital and its executive director is none other than Srdja Popovic [15]. One of the documents circulating in the web that illustrates the training provided by this center is "The nonviolent struggle in 50 points" which draws heavily on arguments by Gene Sharp. The book makes extensive reference to the site of the Albert Einstein Institution is cited as one of the best on the issue. CANVAS is funded, among others, by Freedom House, George Soros was [16] and the International Republican Institute, which has its office in none other than John McCain, presidential candidate 2008 U.S. [17]. Moreover, it is extensively interviewed in the documentary by Manon Loizeau and his involvement in the color revolutions is clearly established. In addition, the authors of the book (which Drdja Popovic) Thank length " their friend "Robert Helvey for having" initiated the amazing potential of strategic nonviolent struggle. "Robert Helvey is a retired U.S. Army colonel, a partner at the Albert Einstein Institution through the CIA, a specialist in Action illegal and dean of the School for training military attaches of the U.S. embassies [18].

The spokesman of the movement of April 6, Adel Mohamed, said in an interview to Al Jazeera (aired 9 February 2011), he completed an internship at CANVAS during the summer of 2009, well before the riots in Tahrir Square [19]. He became familiar with the techniques of organization and crowd behavior in response to police violence. Subsequently, he formed his trainers.

Ahmed Maher, the founder of the movement of April 6, told a Los Angeles Times that he admired the Orange Revolution in Ukraine and the Serbs who toppled Slobodan Milosevic [20].

Another similarity between the Serbian revolution and revolt in Egypt is adopting the logo OTPOR by the motion of April 6, as have other color revolutions [21].

Moreover, the website of this movement contains a long list of behaviors to be adopted by the members if they are arrested by the police. This indicative list is extremely comprehensive guide reminiscent of "non-violent struggle in 50 points" of CANVAS [22].

Among Egyptian activists, some were in the spotlight during the last days of the Mubarak regime. Among them, Wael Ghonim is a prominent figure who was imprisoned for 12 days after being released, gave an interview to Egyptian Dream Channel 2 where he tells of his captivity and collapses in tears before leaving the platform. The audiovisual performance has made this a dissident hero despite himself.

Educated at American University Cairo (coincidence?) Egyptian Wael Ghonim is living in Dubai works as a marketing head at Google (another coincidence?) for the Middle East and Northern Africa and married with a U.S. (one last coincidence?) . Wael is a recently active in the movement of 6 April, but he worked closely with Ahmed Maher [23]. What draws attention in his televised speech, his statement that when shown images of young people killed during the protests: "I want to tell every mother, every father who lost a son, I 'm excuse, it's not our fault, I swear, this is not our fault, it's the fault of anyone who was in power and it was retained. "This statement shows that the movement was highly organized and none of the members had expected losses as large in the ranks of demonstrators, mostly young people who were contacted through social networks.

Another surprising information: Google CEO said he was "very proud of what Wael Ghonim had done" as if to make revolution was part of the job description of a marketing manager of any firm [24].

The Egyptian revolt, as the color revolutions, made characters appear "internationally respectable" ready to be the figurehead of a democratic change in the country's political life. The favorite candidate of the movement of 6 April is undoubtedly Mohamed El Baradei, Nobel Peace and former director of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). The Western media hype around her "inevitable" candidacy was ultimately a damp squib. The people of the street did not acclaimed, and he quickly disappeared from the landscape. It is interesting to note that El Baradei was the preferred candidate of the United States. Indeed, the former head of the IAEA is a member International Crisis Group and registered with many members, including George Soros (again!) [25]. The world is really small, it's the least we can say.

Finally, note that the NED, nicknamed the "Nebula" democratic "interference" by Thierry Meyssan was created by Ronald Reagan to pursue the secrets of the CIA [26]. The 2009 report shows that this organization has awarded approximately $ 1.5 million to more than 30 Egyptian NGOs "for growth and strengthening democratic institutions around the world" as claimed on their website [27].

The use of new technologies, so praised by the U.S. administration, is a reliable choice for non-violent struggle. She can contact an impressive number of people in record time and exchange digital data and information of great importance both inside and outside the country. The massive investments made by institutions and the U.S. State Department in this area are in order to improve the techniques of evasion of state censorship, geolocation activists during their arrest and sending pictures and videos that can show the face "inhuman" autocratic regimes. The recent announcement by the Swedish network for disseminating Bambuser free from a mobile phone, video footage and live online flash storage is a good example [28].

However, once in the street, crowds of mobilization techniques, socialization with representatives of the order, logistics management and conduct in cases of violence or use of weapons for dispersing crowds require adequate training and time-consuming. In the case of Egypt, this was made possible through the assimilation of know-how of CANVAS and training provided and funded various American institutions.

It is clear that the revolt of the Egyptian street is not as spontaneous as claimed by the major media and commentators. This does nothing to the remarkable commitment of the Egyptian people that followed the leaders of the movement of 6 April and his noble sacrifice to get rid of a corrupt system to access a better life.

But hopefully, the historic revolt of the Egyptian street and the heavy price he has paid in recent weeks are not confiscated by foreign interests. The recent U.S. veto against a draft resolution condemning the Israeli settlement policy is a bad omen. The motion of April 6 he was not sensitive to the suffering of the Palestinian people [29]?

Next: Part 2: Tunisia and other Arab countries.

* Doctor in Physics, Montreal (Canada)

References:

1. "Egypt calls the assets of Mubarak and his family abroad," Le Monde, February 21, 2011, http://www.lemonde.fr/proche-orient/article/2011/02/21/l- egypt-ask-the-freezing-of-assets-to-Mubarak-and-his-family-al-etranger_1483326_3218.html # ens_id = 1470465 & xtor = RSS-3208

2. "Egypt demand the freezing of assets of former regime officials Mubarak ", Le Monde, 15 February 2011, http://www.lemonde.fr/proche-orient/article/2011/02/15/l-egypte-demande- the gel-to-assets-d-old-makers-of-regime-moubarak_1480192_3218.html

3. "Hillary Clinton is campaigning for freedom on the Internet", Le Monde, 16 February 2011, http://www.lemonde.fr/technologies/article/2011/02/16/hillary-clinton-milite-pour-la-liberte- on-internet_1480855_651865.html

4. "Google, the U.S. and Egypt," Le Monde, February 3, 2011, http://www.lemonde.fr/technologies/article/2011/02/03/google-les-etats-unis-et- l-egypte_1474508_651865.html

5. Ahmed Bensaada, "Tehran-Gaza: the difference media, Geostrategy, July 3, 2009, http://www.ahmedbensaada.com/index.php?option = com_content & view = article & id = 49: Tehran-gaza-the-difference-media & catid = 37: Company & Itemid = 75

6. "Iran: Washington works with Twitter, Technaut, June 18, 2009, http://technaute. cyberpresse.ca/nouvelles/internet/200906/16/01-876173-iran-washington-intervient-aupres-de-twitter.php

7. See, for example, John Laughland, "The technique of the coup colorful", Voltaire Network, January 4, 2010, http://www.voltairenet.org/article163449.html

8. Manon Loizeau, "The U.S. conquest of the East", 2005. This documentary can be viewed at the following address: http://mecanoblog.wordpress. com/2009/10/16/etats-unis-a-la-conquete-de-lest-video /

9. See, for example, Ian Traynor, "U.S. Campaign Behind the Turmoil in Kiev, The Guardian, 26 November 2004, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/nov/26/ukraine.usa

10. Shabab 6 April Youth Movement, http://

shabab6april.wordpress.com/shabab-6-april-youth-movement-about-us-in-english /

11. Wikileaks, cable 10CAIRO99, http://213.251.145.96/cable/2010/01/10CAIRO99.html

12. Wikileaks, cable 08CAIRO2371, http://www.wikileaks .ch/cable/2008/11/08CAIRO2371.html

13. Fanoos Encyclopedia, "Israa Abdel Fattah, http://www.fanoos.com/society/israa_abdel_fattah.html

14. Michel Chossudovsky, "The protest movement in Egypt:" dictators "do not dictate, they obey orders," Globalization, February 9, 2011, http://dissidentvoice.org/2011/02/the-junk-bond-% E2% 80% 9Cteflon-guy% E2% 80% 9D-behind-egypt% E2% 80% 99s-nonviolent-revolution /

15. Canvasopedia, http://www.canvasopedia.org/

16. Maidhc O. Cathail, "The Junk Bond" Teflon Guy "Behind Egypt's Nonviolent Revolution," Dissident Voice, February 16, 2011, http://dissidentvoice.org/2011/02/the-junk-bond-% E2% 80% 9Cteflon-guy% E2% 80% 9D-behind- egypt% E2% 80% 99s-nonviolent-revolution /

17. Tony Cartalucci, CIA Coup-College: Recycled Revolutionary "props", "War News, February 20, 2011, http://www.infowars.com/cia-coup-college-recycled-revolutionary-props/

18. Thierry Meyssan, "The Albert Einstein Institution: non-violence CIA", Voltaire Network, June 4, 2007, http://www.voltairenet.org/article15870.html

19. Tina Rosenberg, "U Revolution", Foreign Policy, February 18 2011, http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/02/16/revolution_u?page=0, 7

20. Jeffrey Fleishman, "Young Egyptians mount unusual challenge to Mubarak," Los Angeles Times, January 27, 2011, http://articles.latimes.com/2011/jan/27/world/la-fg-egypt-youth-20110128 <

21. Florian Bieber, "The Connection Otpor in Egypt", Balkan Insight, 31 January 2011, http://www.balkaninsight. com / en / blog / the-Otpor-connection-in-egypt

22. Shabab 6 April Youth Movement, "What if you are arrested," http://shabab6april.wordpress.com/shabab-6-april-youth-movement-about-us-in-english/v

23. David D. And David Kirkpatrick E. Sanger, "Egyptians and Tunisian Collaborated to Shake Arab History," The New York Times, February 13, 2011, http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/14/world/middleeast/14egypt-tunisia-protests.html

24. AFP, "Egypt: Google CEO" very proud "of what was accomplished Wael Ghonim, February 15, 2011, http://www.france24.com/fr/20110215-egypte-le-pdg-google-tres -proud-qua-done-wael-ghonim

25. International Crisis Group, Crisis Group Announces New Board Members, 1 July 2010, http://www.crisisgroup.org/en/publication-type/media-releases/2010/crisis-group-announces-new-board-members . aspx

26. Thierry Meyssan, "The Nebula interference "democratic", Voltaire Network, January 22, 2004, http://www.voltairenet.org/article12196.html

27. NED, "2009 Annual report: Egypt, http://www.ned.org/publications/annual-reports/2009-annual-report/middle-east-and-north-africa/description-of-2009-gra- 2

28. Yves Eudes, "videos live views and stored away", Le Monde, 21 February 2011, http://www.lemonde.fr/afrique/article/2011/02/21/des-videos-vues- in-direct-and-stored-al-3212.html abri_1483057_

29. The International Solidarity Movement, "Mohamed Adel has finally been released," http://www.ism-france.org/temoignages/Mohamed-Adel-a-ENFIN-ete-libere-article-10484







PDF



Download the paper



Abdelwahab Houhai
ELACHOUR
BP45 16103 ALGERIA ALGIERS

tel 213 553 44 71 71
skype lefacteurfou

Subject: Fw:

Wednesday, March 2, 2011

Lyricaldance Costumes

A month with Salonen (4) Dona nobis, Dona Eis ... A month with

Ω

- Paris, Theatre du Chatelet, February 4, 2011
- Messiaen A Smile - Salonen Dona Nobis Pacem; Insomnia - Ligeti, Requiem
- Barbara Hannigan, soprano
- Virpi Räisäinen-Midth, mezzo
- Choir Master and Radio France, Sofi Jeannin, direction
- Orchestre Philharmonique de Radio France
- Esa-Pekka Salonen, executive


If there is a concert of Attendance 2011 that calls for little comment, is that latter, which opened the twenty-first festival gloriously by the new return Esa-Pekkainen. , And this, especially since it is fortunately among those whose film is still available (below) And yet it mildly Salonen was expected, was it for execution if rare Ligeti Requiem, as the messiah. Even his most important (at my eyes anyway) were not included in this inaugural program. And even so, by a strange paradox, this edition of Attendance began with a concert including creating a single (global, certainly), in this case a piece of ten minutes for children's choir ... And yet, despite all odds, the feverish desire of the evening, what a shock! Maybe it was there, indeed, the reverse phenomenon of listening to one having left me a little about my hunger during the concert in London ...
There was the start of concert something very similar with respect Salonen at the beginning of the head of Philhar 'at this concert already legendary 19 December 2008 - we do not want to see that as the beginning of a long and beautiful love story. Between what Messiaen and Ravel pushing it in ways very similar boundaries of elegance, of the immateriality of musical gesture in music that are eager to be heard with meaning, we feel able to revive twice the same miracle. Salonen in the direction of A Smile can not be described as anything but a miracle. By a curious coincidence, this beautiful piece of homage to Mozart will almost Messiaen was given three times in Paris during the 2008-2009 season, by Jonathan Nott and the Opera Orchestra, Daniele Gatti for his enthronement as head of the National, and finally by Marek Janowski and Orchestre de Paris . There were good things in those, especially in Nott and Janowski, but nothing, absolutely nothing comparable with this lesson evidence, simplicity of tone, accuracy and consistency of beaten, harmonic sophistication as if a one ear, that of the head, driving the total growth. The last four pages, from this point of view, are a kind of limit point of a conductor, Salonen like to offer to (re) discover regularly : This point is very suitable for Salonen, being one in which one gains the impression that the chef seems to be rather a (large) leading pianist ideally its polyphony.

The first performance of Dona Nobis Pacem for children's choir, the Master Radio-France, is a nice (half) surprise. It was the first time, as many people, I heard of Salonen struggling with minimal means (in theory at least) of writing, and the result appears very successful here, even flatter the image of music somewhat naive - but is not this part of By the way, with these children of our time asking forgiveness for sins they did not commit? The play is in any case a real interest in its major development, which uses the harmonic motion of departure in an ostinato moving under different treatment (reversal, alteration) from one group to another, without forcing the individualized voice than reason. What emerges is a touching expression transparency in its movement falsely calm and steady, the whole being, not surprisingly, defended brilliantly by Sofi Jeannin and toddlers.
NB. To win room, and because the passage makes sense only in its near completeness, violins 1 and 2 that never play together except the last two steps of the extract are reduced on a scope, and percussion, as an example.


Insomnia is one of those works that have marked the comeback of composer Salonen discography on the scene, Deutsche Grammophon (his previous album for Sony being passed unnoticed when it contained more pages yet remarkable). I recall having discovered this record, in 2004, and have found as many people as the composer could not get in right ankle. Not only would I have changed radically over time, but I have changed my mind about the works in question (except for the most part, on Wing on Wing ). French for a first, at least Will have been a little been sorely lacking in the essence of the contemporary Parisian scene: the conflict and passion! The brief silence following the conclusion of Insomnia was broken by an eloquent "is preposterous," the cheers mingling then noisily the "scandalous!". Hope for the best start of the festival of ways: the music writing is not dead, and any given partition in creation is not doomed to be received by the critical success more or less polite and consensual. And indeed, this partition there, so it is certainly not the deepest of its author, is not consensual - the U.S., where we accept very well the coexistence of this music with the mainstream post serial-Germanic, perhaps, but on the Old Continent, certainly not. Because it exhibits a peculiar insolence that is common to all pages of orchestral Salonen since overhaul of Giro and more from THE Variations: a discursive progression clearly intelligible, organic in nature and mainly concerned with the specific time to listen, a harmonic framework for the primary catalyst formal (pedal shifting the tone of mi), and use of virtuosity turned to the highlighting of lines rather than burst.
The passage I show here, one of the most remarkable work is very representative of this much-welcome attention paid to the duration of intelligible expression of an idea: especially in the case, as here, where the idea is extremely simple, and emerges from a host of other. One understands better then listening to the reading of this passage (232-251 m) tension has been felt a contradiction between the young Salonen Sibelius dedicated to the cult, which he could not be solved by , and appetite natural jumping directly from Beethoven to the forefront of the twentieth. What was a contradiction here seems to have partially solved in the integration of an obsessive motivic treatment and overly simple to process complex, dense and, admittedly, a little chatty (always these overlays virtuoso solos strings in the first section). Evolution is still ongoing, I will get about Nyx, but in this performance clearly more accomplished than in the recording of Stockholm, led by a great evening of Roussev including in said passage, visceral listening suggests that Insomnia far outweighs the spectacular nature of his naively formal draft.

I have nothing particularly intelligent to say about the second part of what you can (re) view and (re) listen above. Moment of grace, Sternstunde , Defining Moment in short, where we hoisted the same heights as the greatest achievements Salonen in Paris in recent years (the first concert of the complete Sibelius with Los Angeles, 2008 meeting with the Philharmonie ', only the indescribable Wozzeck last year with the Philharmonia remaining momentarily out of competition, perhaps, but because of the work too. Hannigan was Hannigan Räisäilen -Midth has managed the feat unlikely to stand up to him and even come in complete fusion with her from beginning to end - listen to the Tuba mirum! Bursar effects of edges, perhaps more than we expected, Salonen eve foremost the safety of the improbable chorus, even perhaps slightly biased with the strict prohibition and permanent portamentos comfort ( dare I say) enacted by Ligeti. His Lacrimosa is a continuation of an extraordinary climax to another even though he refuses to use easy highlighted the orchestra (like trumpets), to focus only on the consistency of flow rhythmic because if Ligeti's Requiem as an example is rarely explicit primacy of harmonic phenomenon in music, the worst difficulty once the thing is in place maybe to enhance the precision of rhythmic relations (in the broader sense, the small and large temporal) has Ligeti thought: this is again the master of organic spoke, without forcing anything, without trying to win by not dramatizing anything, seizing every minute to the terror of a strong hand, but peaceful.

Theo Belaud

little concertorialiste by Theo Belaud is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution - Noncommercial - Share Alike Alike 2.0 France .